Armadillo Rage
Wanderer
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
no not really. i said if a blue attacks.
The Noid;1587095 said:
no not really. i said if a blue attacks.
UOGamers Community
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
To obtain new Razor updates, please reinstall Razor from our new website.
RFC: Reds and Towns
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Status
misterbob102299
Wanderer
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
imo it is fun to see how long i can set without 20 blues trying to kill me
GimpCent;1587096 said:
imo it is fun to see how long i can set without 20 blues trying to kill me
I_have_fans
Wanderer
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
Anybody who voted "I like it" should go back to OSI and head to Trammel.. Keep it how it is. Reds are fair game in town.. They can't attack blues but they can be attacked by any blue and they know that.. Why change it to dampen the PVP even more?..
If anything take off the NPC guard calling in town when looting a blue corpse.
Anybody who voted "I like it" should go back to OSI and head to Trammel.. Keep it how it is. Reds are fair game in town.. They can't attack blues but they can be attacked by any blue and they know that.. Why change it to dampen the PVP even more?..
If anything take off the NPC guard calling in town when looting a blue corpse.
Armadillo Rage
Wanderer
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
maybe blues could get guard killed too if they had attacked a red and then went running into town...hahaha. that would be slightly funny...meh. im sure something could be done about that problem (problem of blues dumping or whatever and then running to guard protection that is).
maybe blues could get guard killed too if they had attacked a red and then went running into town...hahaha. that would be slightly funny...meh. im sure something could be done about that problem (problem of blues dumping or whatever and then running to guard protection that is).
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
the people who want this are the same type of people whos kills come solely from ganking reds who just finished dueling at snowy death, or using a red character to kill people afking at their house, cause they get gimped trying to fight an active player.
the main problem with this shard is player initiative, and lack of organization.
its not hard to get a bunch of guys together in ventrilo and roll around. id love to see more warring, blue vs red guilds and stuff like that.
back on chesapeake in the days, youd have an OiN scout meet a A*G raid party at Buccs or Occlo, and then all of a sudden you have OiN vs A*G and then 2 more guild scouts come by and all of a sudden you have total chaos
really all that needs to be done is people need to start making guilds and rolling out in crews that dont just offscreen after one dump and actually stay and heal an offensive attack
the people who want this are the same type of people whos kills come solely from ganking reds who just finished dueling at snowy death, or using a red character to kill people afking at their house, cause they get gimped trying to fight an active player.
the main problem with this shard is player initiative, and lack of organization.
its not hard to get a bunch of guys together in ventrilo and roll around. id love to see more warring, blue vs red guilds and stuff like that.
back on chesapeake in the days, youd have an OiN scout meet a A*G raid party at Buccs or Occlo, and then all of a sudden you have OiN vs A*G and then 2 more guild scouts come by and all of a sudden you have total chaos
really all that needs to be done is people need to start making guilds and rolling out in crews that dont just offscreen after one dump and actually stay and heal an offensive attack
I_have_fans
Wanderer
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
Reds want to be in guard zones to find a fight, not bank. We're open to thieves and open to 20v1's.. Let us stay in guarded towns.. Take that away then take a little more away.. etc.. it won't be long until there's a Trammel.
GimpCent;1587096 said:
Reds want to be in guard zones to find a fight, not bank. We're open to thieves and open to 20v1's.. Let us stay in guarded towns.. Take that away then take a little more away.. etc.. it won't be long until there's a Trammel.
Heavy Smoker
Knight
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
Agree.
I_have_fans;1587105 said:
Agree.
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
I would like to see a town reds could go to do their business such as bank or shop for regs with out having to worry about being attacked by blues.
* Blues no longer allowed in red guarded towns (killed on sight by guards)
Honestly this would be pretty cool imop.
I think it's only fair though that if a blue attacks a red the red should be able to chase that person into a guarded zone with out fear of being guard killed same could apply for a red guarded town.
I would like to see a town reds could go to do their business such as bank or shop for regs with out having to worry about being attacked by blues.
* Blues no longer allowed in red guarded towns (killed on sight by guards)
Honestly this would be pretty cool imop.
I think it's only fair though that if a blue attacks a red the red should be able to chase that person into a guarded zone with out fear of being guard killed same could apply for a red guarded town.
I_have_fans
Wanderer
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
Wrong. There are plenty of towns and reds can't PK in town unless the person is AFK in which case they might deserve it.. They aren't going to designate more than Bucs to reds.. So you're saying you want a Trammel? Maybe you should go back to OSI where you can be safe.. It's fine the way it is right now. If you want to stay in town and not worry about being PK'd.. Don't go afk away from the bank or NPC and don't attack a red.. It's that simple.
Gaiden;1587108 said:
Wrong. There are plenty of towns and reds can't PK in town unless the person is AFK in which case they might deserve it.. They aren't going to designate more than Bucs to reds.. So you're saying you want a Trammel? Maybe you should go back to OSI where you can be safe.. It's fine the way it is right now. If you want to stay in town and not worry about being PK'd.. Don't go afk away from the bank or NPC and don't attack a red.. It's that simple.
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
I like it as long as occlo remains unguarded. There's really not much of a point for a PK to be in town, other than to bank of course. In that case there's Occlo and Buc's Den. Murderers shouldn't have life easy, it's like playing the game on a harder difficulty. It's not catering to the blues, it's just cutting them a break.
I like it as long as occlo remains unguarded. There's really not much of a point for a PK to be in town, other than to bank of course. In that case there's Occlo and Buc's Den. Murderers shouldn't have life easy, it's like playing the game on a harder difficulty. It's not catering to the blues, it's just cutting them a break.
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
In all out honesty, the only change I think we should see is a Tramme/Felucca type deal, Trammel being towns for blues, felucca being towns for reds...
yeah I said it, u can go in trammel as a red, or felucca as a blue
if anyone attacks anyone in guards, boom wacked
why not just do that form of a change, then reds could sit in town all day and not have to worry about being killed by another red (same as a blue does)
hell, why dont we just get rid of ALL TOWNS and just have shops, no guards anywhere...
then red tamers wouldnt have to worry about getting their mares boated because blues gank them, cuz reds surely cant come into towns and gank blues and bring their mares out and boat them, which is all occlo and bucs is, pure pvp towns in which most tamers get their mares boated at, red or blue...
BTW- i got reds and blues so im looking at it in two perspectives. and whoopi ive been on UO about as long as its been out, and i quit osi cuz they made stupid changes that ruined the game, which is basically what this poll is having us vote about... adding trammel basically on a "pure pvp type server"
In all out honesty, the only change I think we should see is a Tramme/Felucca type deal, Trammel being towns for blues, felucca being towns for reds...
yeah I said it, u can go in trammel as a red, or felucca as a blue
if anyone attacks anyone in guards, boom wacked
why not just do that form of a change, then reds could sit in town all day and not have to worry about being killed by another red (same as a blue does)
hell, why dont we just get rid of ALL TOWNS and just have shops, no guards anywhere...
then red tamers wouldnt have to worry about getting their mares boated because blues gank them, cuz reds surely cant come into towns and gank blues and bring their mares out and boat them, which is all occlo and bucs is, pure pvp towns in which most tamers get their mares boated at, red or blue...
BTW- i got reds and blues so im looking at it in two perspectives. and whoopi ive been on UO about as long as its been out, and i quit osi cuz they made stupid changes that ruined the game, which is basically what this poll is having us vote about... adding trammel basically on a "pure pvp type server"
Armadillo Rage
Wanderer
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
might be fun to try at least..
Gaiden;1587108 said:
might be fun to try at least..
Armadillo Rage
Wanderer
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
thats not really what i meant to try{guards turned off). heh. but i bet when they did that it sure was interesting. either i wasnt playing those times or i wasnt on hybrid yet.
anyways. yeah. good nite.
GimpCent;1587118 said:
thats not really what i meant to try{guards turned off). heh. but i bet when they did that it sure was interesting. either i wasnt playing those times or i wasnt on hybrid yet.
anyways. yeah. good nite.
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
If they decide to implement one of the following:
Re-read my post for one. I hated Trammel what did I say in my post that insinuated I wanted Trammel? I was trying to make a point, I'm guessing you did not understand. I play mainly reds, I quit playing UO / OSI when they created Trammel.I_have_fans;1587112 said:
If they decide to implement one of the following:
Then they might as well make a Trammel.
Long John Silver
Wanderer
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
i still say u dont change it cause its not like a red can kill a blue in town already unless he or she attacks him first
i still say u dont change it cause its not like a red can kill a blue in town already unless he or she attacks him first
I_have_fans
Wanderer
Re: RFC: Reds and Towns
It's the first step in that direction.. The direction which ruined UO in the first place.
What is wrong with reds being in town? You'll get PK'd macroing afk? Most reds don't do that anyways.. It's almost always a blue with few counts that will kill you.
You don't want to attack a red then chase him out of town and run into 5 more? Don't attack reds if you don't want to die. They can't kill you unless you attack first.
KEEP REDS IN GUARD PROTECT UNDER THE SAME RULES AS IS. No experienced pvper would vote for this change.. Only PVMers, which there are no monsters in town to begin with. I was under the impression that this was a PVP based server.
GimpCent;1587116 said:
It's the first step in that direction.. The direction which ruined UO in the first place.
What is wrong with reds being in town? You'll get PK'd macroing afk? Most reds don't do that anyways.. It's almost always a blue with few counts that will kill you.
You don't want to attack a red then chase him out of town and run into 5 more? Don't attack reds if you don't want to die. They can't kill you unless you attack first.
KEEP REDS IN GUARD PROTECT UNDER THE SAME RULES AS IS. No experienced pvper would vote for this change.. Only PVMers, which there are no monsters in town to begin with. I was under the impression that this was a PVP based server.
- Status