GasMask;1681196 said:Hmm well im running off someone elses router in the neighborhood temperarely.
when i get mine turned back on, it will have road runner high speed cable.
Endless Darc;1681253 said:I live in Cleveland Ohio, My ping went from 50-60ms to 25-40ms
ty Ryan :>
LeGiOn-hybrid;1681259 said:Who is your isp?
[FONT=Tahoma]C:\Documents and Settings\Brandon>tracert 67.192.185.136 ([B]Current[/B])[/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma]Tracing route to 67.192.185.136 over a maximum of 30 hops[/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma] 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms launchmodem [192.168.1.254]
2 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 68.152.229.54
3 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 68.216.237.249
4 20 ms 20 ms 26 ms ixc01mgm-ge-0-2-2.bellsouth.net [205.152.170.30][/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma] 5 19 ms 20 ms 20 ms axr00aep-so-2-0-0.bellsouth.net [65.83.236.38]
6 20 ms 20 ms 19 ms axr01aep-ge-5-0-0.bellsouth.net [65.83.238.35]
7 20 ms 19 ms 20 ms pxr00asm-3-0-0.bellsouth.net [65.83.236.6]
8 20 ms 21 ms 19 ms ge-4-2-1.mpr2.atl6.us.above.net [64.125.12.221][/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma] 9 21 ms 20 ms 20 ms xe-0-0-0.mpr3.atl6.us.above.net [64.125.31.41]
10 35 ms 35 ms 35 ms ge-2-1-0.mpr4.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.31.50]
11 40 ms 40 ms 41 ms so-1-1-0.mpr2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.26.133][/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma] 12 52 ms 73 ms 63 ms xe-1-1-0.er2.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.26.214]
13 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms xe-0-0-0.er1.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.26.205]
14 49 ms 54 ms 49 ms 209.133.126.42
15 60 ms 59 ms 60 ms vlan905.core5.dfw1.rackspace.com [67.192.56.229][/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma] 16 60 ms 60 ms 61 ms 67.192.56.35
17 48 ms 48 ms 48 ms 67.192.185.136[/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma]Trace complete.[/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma]C:\Documents and Settings\Brandon>tracert 209.173.139.110 ([B]OH)[/B][/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma]Tracing route to 209.173.139.110 over a maximum of 30 hops[/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma] 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms launchmodem [192.168.1.254]
2 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 68.152.229.54
3 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms 68.216.237.249
4 50 ms 33 ms 32 ms ixc01mgm-ge-0-2-2.bellsouth.net [205.152.170.30][/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma] 5 19 ms 20 ms 20 ms axr00aep-so-2-0-0.bellsouth.net [65.83.236.38]
6 31 ms 32 ms 32 ms pxr00ash-so-0-1-0.bellsouth.net [65.83.236.74]
7 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms peer-01-ge-3-1-0-14.asbn.twtelecom.net [66.192.2
52.236]
8 48 ms 48 ms 49 ms 207-250-147-226.static.twtelecom.net [207.250.14
7.226]
9 49 ms 48 ms 48 ms 207-250-147-226.static.twtelecom.net [207.250.14
7.226]
10 48 ms 48 ms 49 ms 209.173.128.70
11 50 ms 49 ms 49 ms 209.173.128.142
12 50 ms 48 ms 49 ms 209.173.139.110[/FONT]
[FONT=Tahoma]Trace complete.[/FONT]
Mark;1680825 said:Those on the east coast, central United States, Canada, and Europe should see a reduction in latency, no packet loss (compared to transient losses over some of the congested Texas links), less jitter (latency variation), and lower hop counts. Users on the west coast can generally expect their latency to increase 20-30ms but should still see a significant overall improvement given the reduction in packet loss and jitter (which affect gameplay much more than latency).
MarcusO;1681479 said:I'm in Northern Virginia on Cox Cable Crap and I was just pinging 45 ms to the Texa$$ IP. The new IP in the Buckeye State puts me at 39 ms...a 13% improvement. Woot! Sucks for Left coast folks though.
If there's another fellow NoVa person out there on Verizon FIOS, can you please post your ping times?