Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

[5 on it]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

I like the way things are now... not that many people house hide

LOL go to any pvp spot where houses are (bucs, brit gy) and then post again k thx.

 

[bballerjess]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

i think this problem is very complicated and a difficult one to solve. Maybe you could track how many times people ban things from their house and if they are abusing it, revoke their ability to ban people. When they are in a combative state. But thats too complicated too. This problem blows.

 

[LiquifiedArt]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

NO, Overall it needs to be thought out better, 1a) is proably the only viable one, and if anything it should be if a player is in COmbat just the same as u cant recall during combat... But not for all criminals, all reds, all factions, and all warring guilds, and all friends/coowns who meet that criteria... Sounds pretty ridiculous to me.. and unfair.

 

[juggalinninja]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

I think taking away banning for combative players is not a good idea for the fact that what if your red and a new rez, someone attacks you and the only way you can survive is if you run in your house and ban them while you equip your pvp supplies. If you red you would not be able to, correct?

 

[Phyrex]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

And what penaltie does this give to the Murderer? My main character is Red, but not a random PK. I'm red because it's a part of my Role. I'm a Roleplayer, not a factioneer.

Can't vote without proper information. Or information I understand .

 

[Ryan]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

NO, Overall it needs to be thought out better, 1a) is proably the only viable one, and if anything it should be if a player is in COmbat just the same as u cant recall during combat... But not for all criminals, all reds, all factions, and all warring guilds, and all friends/coowns who meet that criteria... Sounds pretty ridiculous to me.. and unfair.

Actually this has been thought out pretty well.

I've yet to hear a single reason I consider valid as to why its bad.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

I highly disagree with these changes. The point of having a house is for storage, a logout area, and a safe haven for your characters. What is the point of having the house as a safe haven if anyone can come in and attack you and you can't ban them? The real point of this is just because people use their houses to pvp. If someone is stupid enough to follow someone out to their house and get theirself banned and continue to try to pvp there then they deserve to be banned and killed. As someone mentioned earlier... What if you are trying to restock your house and like 5 people are hiding in there and PK you. It's not like you can ban them. If you want trammel then just add the facet.

 

[peter_mc]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Actually this has been thought out pretty well.

I've yet to hear a single reason I consider valid as to why its bad.

what if you are outnumbered 6-1?

just submit and let them kill you?
this is the final blow to the solo pk

 

[Ryan]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

I highly disagree with these changes. The point of having a house is for storage, a logout area, and a safe haven for your characters. What is the point of having the house as a safe haven if anyone can come in and attack you and you can't ban them? The real point of this is just because people use their houses to pvp. If someone is stupid enough to follow someone out to their house and get theirself banned and continue to try to pvp there then they deserve to be banned and killed. As someone mentioned earlier... What if you are trying to restock your house and like 5 people are hiding in there and PK you. It's not like you can ban them. If you want trammel then just add the facet.

This is the complete opposite of trammel.

You're asking for Trammel by having a safe haven in your house.

Thanks though.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

I've yet to hear a single reason I consider valid as to why its bad.

I've yet to hear a single reason why it's good.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

You're asking for Trammel by having a safe haven in your house.

I am asking to keep felucca the way it is. I'm not asking to screw reds, factions, and everyone but blues. Whats the reason for this anyway?

 

[bballerjess]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

i dont like to argue with Ryan :/

 

[Cuds]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

no need for this. save the reds.

 

[Ryan]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

I've yet to hear a single reason why it's good.

Puts a major curb on house fighting.

 

[skaven-hybrid]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

"I've yet to hear a single reason I consider valid as to why its bad."

Its bad because no one likes the proposal... Shouldnt support house sittin. House hiding is ones choice to be a weiner and it is the attackers choice to sit there and try to kill them or be killed via someone fighting from a house. I see no real problem here. If you cant kill them by time they run in their house oh well, its same as not killing a blue before he gets to guard zone. This is one thing that doesnt need nerfed. Its un needed!

 

[skaven-hybrid]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Puts a major curb on house fighting.

Fight someone who is willing to fight you.... stop trying to fight noobs!

 

[Cuds]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

i wouldnt say nobody likes it, the vote is pretty dead even.

id say that if the vote is that close the change kinda needs to be discussed and modified until we can get a more decisive vote.

 

[Ryan]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

"I've yet to hear a single reason I consider valid as to why its bad."

Its bad because no one likes the proposal... Shouldnt support house sittin. House hiding is ones choice to be a weiner and it is the attackers choice to sit there and try to kill them or be killed via someone fighting from a house. I see no real problem here. If you cant kill them by time they run in their house oh well, its same as not killing a blue before he gets to guard zone. This is one thing that doesnt need nerfed. Its un needed!

Actually its pretty much 50/50 you're wrong.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

This is one thing that doesnt need nerfed. Its un needed!

Very well put.

Puts a major curb on house fighting.

While you are putting a major curb on that. Lets put a curb on the blues. If they go out of town for more than, oh say... 5 minutes. They become attackable by reds. How bout it?

 

[Cuds]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Actually its pretty much 50/50 you're wrong.

beat ya to it lol