I dont Bitch much. Or Enough

[Kumba[IC]]

tamers are the end all of pvp on this shard.. no template even comes close to competing with 5x mage + lore/taming.. peacemaking pets is absolutely useless, i picked it up in order to see if it was any good and i was thoroughly dissappointed, it maybe worked 1 out of every 7 tries.. so the only thing left is for everyone to be tamers and run with two mares, sounds like fun eh.. *sarcasm off*

100.0 hiding works wonders.

 

[Afro Man]

its uhm.. pretty hard to hide when u have mares triple fs'ing you and a player casting spells on you.

Tamers are the downfall of this shard. People say, why make 15-20 macros when i can make 4 (all follow me, all kill, recall macro and paralyze) I think its gimp, just my oppinion though. Tamers don't need to be taken out of factions although that would be nice. I think bonding should be taken off the shard. As many people have mentioned it should be risk vs reward. They make it too easy for tamers and no "true pvper, mage" will ever make a pvp tamer. I personally find it sad that so many people need to resort to this. Most of the tamers in factions don't even know what a 5x duel is. Take bonding off the shard, please, I assure you that will stop 80% of bitching, making bolas require tactics will take care of another 15 the other 5% just are.. gay. Those are basically the only two problems here, and they are pissing off a lot of people. Make it risk vs reward so the tamers need to think twice about bringing their pets to guard or to brit to pvp with them. PvP is more fun then M(s)vP (mare(s) vs players for you slow ones.) imho runics should go too. But w/e!

 

[Cricket]

Runics should've never been put onto this shard...period. Especially with the rate Indest/Vanq/Supreme Acc weapons drop.

The only bonus of bonding is for any player that has a mount that doesn't want to go and re-tame one every time they die...

But if it would remove the amount of tamers, I'd give it up in a second.

~C

 

[Afro Man]

I'm not gonna say make it so that aggresive animals only can't bond because that's unfair. But bonding should have never been put onto this shard in the first place.

 

[Reuip]

now I've a 7gm ww a friend gave to me a little bit ago, and ill tell you i stabled him till he was bonded finally, but i use that thing for money making purposes, and as much as id be sad to see bonding go, and my ww finally killed perma by reds, I'd give it up to see pvp a little more balanced.

Then again, since it is already a part of UOGamers, why not just set a limit on bonded pets? so far how many can you bond with? or actually give the pets some stat loss at res...or maybe turn off bonding when you join factions...how're those ideas guys? instead of complaining its unfair, lets come up with some solutions, eh?

 

[Cronic The BuDda]

now I've a 7gm ww a friend gave to me a little bit ago, and ill tell you i stabled him till he was bonded finally, but i use that thing for money making purposes, and as much as id be sad to see bonding go, and my ww finally killed perma by reds, I'd give it up to see pvp a little more balanced.

Then again, since it is already a part of UOGamers, why not just set a limit on bonded pets? so far how many can you bond with? or actually give the pets some stat loss at res...or maybe turn off bonding when you join factions...how're those ideas guys? instead of complaining its unfair, lets come up with some solutions, eh?

Wow finally a tamer who agrees.

Do you staff even read these fucking forums? this has been an ongoing issue for weeks if not months.

As i see it there are TWO options. Remove pet bonding from factions.
Or b. Make Pet skill gain HARD. so everyone isnt running around with 7x pets.
ALSO. Mares werent able to GM every skill on OSI.

I always hear the excuse well thats how it was on OSI. Yet so much other shit ISNT how it was on OSI. So wtf? ie peacmaking guards wasnt on OSI. But it was nice here. Guards vs pet aggro was on OSI but isnt here...
So seriously who makes the judgement calls?

NERF TAMERS.

 

[DiamondsNGuns]

Mares should be used to bank sit thats all. Thats where EVERYONE THAT PVP WITH PETS BELONGS. Sitting at the bank flirting with other trammys like themselves. I offered Kaka 500k to duel me if he beat me he could keep it, if he lost he didn't have to pay me shit. Infact I will put this challenge out to ALL faction tamers. Kill me in a x5 duel with your tamer using the I wish to duel shit.

 

[jmaster]

Mares should be used to bank sit thats all. Thats where EVERYONE THAT PVP WITH PETS BELONGS. Sitting at the bank flirting with other trammys like themselves. I offered Kaka 500k to duel me if he beat me he could keep it, if he lost he didn't have to pay me shit. Infact I will put this challenge out to ALL faction tamers. Kill me in a x5 duel with your tamer using the I wish to duel shit.

Lemme go make a tamer

 

[Who]

Im not in factions yet, but ima have to agree on this point. Tamers are way over balanced and i have one. I have used my pets in PvP and while its not easy at first, once you get trained they can be deadly. For this reason i dont PvP with my tamer unless there is a red gank squad somewhere bugging the hell outta meh. The fact that one person can controll monsters with over 500 intelligence and strength with little risk is ridiculous. While i have yet to use a bola or seen a tamer use a bola i know how bad those can be (i play OSI sometimes). Currently bolas seem only to be used in ganks, so why not just remove them along with bonding? Fuck my pets. If i have to have a risk (like it should be) in order to have a closer balanced PvP/factions then kill them right now.
While some people need to learn to adapt, theres now way to adapt to a bola and 6 mares let alone 2 on foot. Im not bitching because i have been killed by a tamer, im just bitching because there is something wrong.
If you think im wrong, why do you think OSI nerfed pet speeds so much? Because they saw something unbalanced actually fixed it for once. This is just my 2cents, but like hell if i want to join factions (let alone CoM) and just be a vicitim to bola/tamer ganks.

 

[DeltaGreen]

I vote you make taming/lore 50x harder to GM.

Harder to GM taming = less tamers = less faction tamers = less bullshit in factions.

Common sense?

OSI Faction tamers = lame.
UOG Faction tamers = lame x 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 x 50000000.

- k and thanks!

 

[DiamondsNGuns]

I vote you make taming/lore 50x harder to GM.

Harder to GM taming = less tamers = less faction tamers = less bullshit in factions.

Common sense?

OSI Faction tamers = lame.
UOG Faction tamers = lame x 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 x 50000000.

- k and thanks!

That delta, was the smartest thing you have EVER said.

 

[ColdFire50031]

I vote you make taming/lore 50x harder to GM.

Harder to GM taming = less tamers = less faction tamers = less bullshit in factions.

Common sense?


- k and thanks!

That is brillant logic! OH wait, no it isn't. Right now only CoM has all those faction tamers. Wow, make taming/lore harder to raise so no other faction can keep up? Brillant, brillant, brillant idea.

 

[strtrk]

I dont know why... but I'm not having all these problems when I fight tamers, groups of tamers, and very well organized groups of tamers. I guess my playstyle is much different than your guys'. I go after every class differently, where I think alot of you guys go after tamers like they're mages, and judging from your problems, it's not working too well.

The only reasonable solutions I've seen are rez stat loss for pets, harder to train them. And limit bonded (not get rid of) pets to maybe 1 per character.

Some of you guys want to completely remove tamers from pvp... I can tell by some of the suggestions you give. Which I don't like doing. I dont think it's cool to remove a template or nearly remove with nerfs just cuz I don't play it.

Such as stealing, I wish the success rate was increased a little bit so you'd see some more disarm thieves out there.

If you start completely or nearly removing templates from pvp. Then it's going to get boring because it's going to start being the same all the time. I like way they're trying to improve archery, that's going to give me a whole bunch of new things to look out for when i pvp (if they do it right). I like variety, and I like challenges.

 

[EastB]

Wow Mike, you must be a good friend of the admin, or you wouldn't be a GM anymore with the way you act.

But yes, I got an idea. I'm going to make a new char, GM taming and lore and magery and all that, and join CoM. Then I will attack all CoM on sight, if they are not under protection of the town guards. Sounds like a plan to me.

 

[Eeyore-PiG-]

ok mike is an admin, moron.

 

[Jame?]

But yes, I got an idea. I'm going to make a new char, GM taming and lore and magery and all that, and join CoM. Then I will attack all CoM on sight, if they are not under protection of the town guards. Sounds like a plan to me.

yup lol sounds good ... just sit there in their base ...

 

[EastB]

ok mike is an admin, moron.

Mike is Offline:
Game Master

Yeah, I'm a moron allright. It was stupid of me to assume he was just a GM. Don't know where that idea came from. I guess I should be more careful before I say something.

 

[Mike-hybrid]

Mike is Offline:
Game Master

Yeah, I'm a moron allright. It was stupid of me to assume he was just a GM. Don't know where that idea came from. I guess I should be more careful before I say something.

Mike is Online:
Game Master

This means you are about to get slapped for thinking you know me, or assuming things about me.

 

[EastB]

Lmao, yeah. I assumed you were a GM because it said you were a GM under your name. Who am I to make assumptions based on that. Who am I to make such assumptions But my bad! Just avoid the whole topic of this thread - slap away!