woodycook
Knight
Re: 9/11 Moment of silence
Watch this video with NIST's John Gross saying there was no molten steel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmrZ3JmgONI
Thermal imaging shows molten steel under buildings 1, 2, and 7.
Molten steel was found under the towers even 2 MONTHS after september 11th. This doesn't happen in fires, and John Gross even said so himself.
Insults are typically used when frustrated people can't produce facts to back up their claims. Keep the debate civilized or admit I'm right and leave. I'm not here to bicker, if you can't provide to the debate then don't participate.
EvilChild;784967 said:Jet fuel burns more than hot enough to weaken steel. Not melt steel, but yes it will weaken steel. As far as the molten steel found months later in the debris? I have no idea how that would even be possible regardless of how the buildings were taken down. It seems most likely that whoever is quoted saying that was either taken out of context, or didn't know what they were talking about to begin with.
Watch this video with NIST's John Gross saying there was no molten steel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmrZ3JmgONI
Thermal imaging shows molten steel under buildings 1, 2, and 7.
Molten steel was found under the towers even 2 MONTHS after september 11th. This doesn't happen in fires, and John Gross even said so himself.
EvilChild;784967 said:I have to agree with bacchus. For conspiracy nuts, it shouldn't be an argument of how the WTCs fell, but rather of who was flying the planes that took them down.
Insults are typically used when frustrated people can't produce facts to back up their claims. Keep the debate civilized or admit I'm right and leave. I'm not here to bicker, if you can't provide to the debate then don't participate.