UOGamers Community

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • To obtain new Razor updates, please reinstall Razor from our new website.

Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

What should we do about this?

  • lol, then ban him right away

    Votes: 298 80.3%
  • lol, then ban if he ever uses it again

    Votes: 73 19.7%

  • Total voters
    371
  • Poll closed .

Lorthic

Knight
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

syrupz;1681980 said:
leet sauce banstick plz... lawls cheater banning cheater... mark whysoterrible? lawlerskatezz

Someone's busted...

Too bad he couldn't pvp even with the client.
 

Rhadam

Page
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

Lorthic;1682665 said:
Someone's busted...

Too bad he couldn't pvp even with the client.

in 2v2s he was "good" simply because he could perfectly heal teammates.. and i'm sure he could sync perfectly with somebody else...
 

Mark

Knight
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

There were other people using it; nobody used it as much as he did.

I don't generally check the log unless there is a complaint, that is why he got away with it for so long.
 

Rhadam

Page
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

Mark;1682710 said:
There were other people using it; nobody used it as much as he did.

I don't generally check the log unless there is a complaint, that is why he got away with it for so long.

You seem to be pretty lenient with cheaters... why is that?
 

elohdee

Knight
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

Cheating at a 12 year old game, damn, that must be cool....

lol uogamers...
 

Mark

Knight
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

Rhadam;1682715 said:
You seem to be pretty lenient with cheaters... why is that?

Here is a sorted list of everyone who has used that specific version in May and the number of times they used it:

Code:
     86 Tryst 72.184.66.129
     47 en ay es tee why 72.184.66.129
     42 kryptonic- 71.238.171.246
     25 Alchedamus 71.238.171.246
     17 kryptonic 71.238.171.246
     13 OOllOOlll 72.184.66.129
     10 Dolamaust 71.238.171.246
      7 chug.run.pvp 72.184.66.129
      7 a red SYRUPZ omg 72.184.66.129
      5 Jesus of SDS 72.184.66.129
      5 es y r u p ze 72.184.66.129
      5 a pokeball 72.184.66.129
      4 Uber 72.184.66.129
      3 Brain 71.238.171.246
      2 Robin I 72.184.66.129
      2 Mortimer 71.238.171.246
      1 Zerfall 98.165.232.214
      1 syrupz 72.184.66.129
      1 No Refunds 98.165.232.214
      1 jackina box 71.238.171.246
      1 Evade 24.141.247.102
      1 Evade 24.141.242.124
      1 E-mc2 68.55.7.90
      1 droppedyerpocket 71.238.171.246
      1 crunchy black 71.238.171.246
      1 1 R35 5L P3T5 98.165.232.214

Clearly the primary offender is 72.184.66.129 (Syrupz). Aside from 71.238.171.246 there really isn't anyone else. It has nothing to do with being lenient; unless there is a complaint I generally have much more important things to deal with.
 

coldblood

Knight
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

Mark;1682724 said:
Here is a sorted list of everyone who has used that specific version in May and the number of times they used it:

Code:
     86 Tryst 72.184.66.129
     47 en ay es tee why 72.184.66.129
     42 kryptonic- 71.238.171.246
     25 Alchedamus 71.238.171.246
     17 kryptonic 71.238.171.246
     13 OOllOOlll 72.184.66.129
     10 Dolamaust 71.238.171.246
      7 chug.run.pvp 72.184.66.129
      7 a red SYRUPZ omg 72.184.66.129
      5 Jesus of SDS 72.184.66.129
      5 es y r u p ze 72.184.66.129
      5 a pokeball 72.184.66.129
      4 Uber 72.184.66.129
      3 Brain 71.238.171.246
      2 Robin I 72.184.66.129
      2 Mortimer 71.238.171.246
      1 Zerfall 98.165.232.214
      1 syrupz 72.184.66.129
      1 No Refunds 98.165.232.214
      1 jackina box 71.238.171.246
      1 Evade 24.141.247.102
      1 Evade 24.141.242.124
      1 E-mc2 68.55.7.90
      1 droppedyerpocket 71.238.171.246
      1 crunchy black 71.238.171.246
      1 1 R35 5L P3T5 98.165.232.214

Clearly the primary offender is 72.184.66.129 (Syrupz). Aside from 71.238.171.246 there really isn't anyone else. It has nothing to do with being lenient; unless there is a complaint I generally have much more important things to deal with.

when you ban him, give me his loot, because it belongs to me :(
 
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

lol..

u guys have to cheat to win even pinging -24 ms..........


my best ping is 300ms and I still kill ppl
sad
 

Abhorsen

Knight
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

STFU AQUILES U PIECE OF SHIT. GET THE FUCK OUT WITH YOUR "d00d, i fukin merk bitches with 300+ ping. omgoose omgoose omgoose. im soo much better than you n3wbz. suk mai balz."

lol
done
 
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

lol
why u mad??

i didnt say i am better than anyone..
i was just saying that some ppl have to use scripts to play this game...
 

BoneBro

Wanderer
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

wait........... illegal? hmmmm our own admin mark uses it........hmmm.........additional shame? whats more shameful....owning the server.......or having to use mark and akasha to guard sigs omgoose roflmfao we see whos shameful
 
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

there is a differnce between a admin useing something like that and a player..... the admins have worked there asses off to script this shard for us and if they wanna play and be almost unbeatable then let them... but if a player thinks he should be able to do it he should be kicked in the nuts and banned because he didnt do shit for the shard
 

Snax

Wanderer
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

FLICK-hybrid;1683417 said:
there is a differnce between a admin useing something like that and a player..... the admins have worked there asses off to script this shard for us and if they wanna play and be almost unbeatable then let them... but if a player thinks he should be able to do it he should be kicked in the nuts and banned because he didnt do shit for the shard


That is an abso-fucking-lutely retarded concept...

Essentially let the admins have game breaking advantages and one hit war hammers and uber mares because they "script" the shard?

Maybe you guys forgot but when Ryan was running shit none of this kind of garbage went down...
 

francois!

Wanderer
Re: Syrupz brings (additional) shame to EQ/MS

so basically flick you are saying that the shard is theirs to destroy as they see fit?
 
Top