Howl
Sorceror
Re: Earth was RAPED
first paragraph is pretty fucking arbitrary and damn-right incorrect. if i didn't have so much actual work to do at the moment i'd argue you down about that. i haven't studied env science for three years for nothing.
second paragraph starts off with an ad hominem argument, and then a misrepresentation of what i said. precisely because we need the planet for survival is the reason why we have a duty to it: because we have a duty to our descendants.
last sentence is a straw man argument
Oaks;793873 said:Not true. Posted a reply to this before in the climate gate thread. Nature itself still puts far, far more harmful gasses in the atmosphere then we as humans do. All part of the natural cycle.
I think you have been reading too many sociology books lately. Dutiful inhabitants..bit far fetched. Even if the planet becomes uninhabitable for us, doesn't mean the whole planet is doomed. It will sort out itself eventually and life in the form of bacteria/single cell organisms carries on anyway. We might need the planet for our survival, but unfortunately it is not the other way around.
Just because marx says this does not mean he's right. I can quote one of my mates too; "it's all bollocks!". Noone is right or wrong, but it helps to distance our own species in the bigger picture of the history of the planet.
first paragraph is pretty fucking arbitrary and damn-right incorrect. if i didn't have so much actual work to do at the moment i'd argue you down about that. i haven't studied env science for three years for nothing.
second paragraph starts off with an ad hominem argument, and then a misrepresentation of what i said. precisely because we need the planet for survival is the reason why we have a duty to it: because we have a duty to our descendants.
last sentence is a straw man argument