Project 7
Page
That takes skill!Fights 7 v 0..... gets guard wacked
That takes skill!Fights 7 v 0..... gets guard wacked
Who are you?You are obviously not qualified to speak about factions, Minax has the koreans, not SL. and COM has super A.D.D., which is why they didnt have any towns before hiring Minax to baby sit. Everyone so used to sucking dick for wut they get, they forget wut earning a trophy isntead of buying it is like.
that moment when ive beaten you at every aspect of the game as the leader of my squad. you get picked up off the bench chump.I haven't heard this much crying since Tyler rage quit because he couldn't heal ebolt syncs.
that moment when ive beaten you at every aspect of the game as the leader of my squad. you get picked up off the bench chump.
@Boomshakalaka
Mickey has to rely on his buddies to carry him. Which is why he did not offer 1v1
Like I said before. You win 6-3 once in your life. You won't duel me anymore because you won't risk losing. I've stomped you every duel we've ever had other than that.
Field and pits.
That's pretty counter-intuitive if you ask me. By saying that someone wins a duel based off of a "lucky" stun then anyone can use that same excuse regardless of the amount of duels lost to that specific person. If i were to lose 1000 times to someone I could claim "anyone can get a lucky stun", does that mean that all of those duels should be negated due to the fact that I claim they got lucky stuns?Yep the one time you ever beat me.
Congrats on the biggest accomplishment of your life.
I guess that negates the other 1000x I have beat you.
Remember it's alchy, anybody can get a lucky stun
In my prime, when I and actual competition played, my group beat you.You have never beaten me at any aspect of the game.
Care to do some 2v2 3v3 4v4 5v5 for gold?
Oh that's right after spending thousands of wasted hours on this game the only thing you can do is alchy.
That's cute
no, what's really counter intuitive is pat dueled me one time and quit afterwards for obvious reasons. I'm guessing he only speaks about "anybody can get lucky" once in a while when it suits him the most.That's pretty counter-intuitive if you ask me. By saying that someone wins a duel based off of a "lucky" stun then anyone can use that same excuse regardless of the amount of duels lost to that specific person. If i were to lose 1000 times to someone I could claim "anyone can get a lucky stun", does that mean that all of those duels should be negated due to the fact that I claim they got lucky stuns?
That's pretty counter-intuitive if you ask me. By saying that someone wins a duel based off of a "lucky" stun then anyone can use that same excuse regardless of the amount of duels lost to that specific person. If i were to lose 1000 times to someone I could claim "anyone can get a lucky stun", does that mean that all of those duels should be negated due to the fact that I claim they got lucky stuns?
In my prime, when I and actual competition played, my group beat you.
I haven't played this game competitively in several years now. I lead my group, you've bench played with yours. The only thing this server comes to complete agreement on is how shini and neon are both better you and carry you. It's funny and cute you think group fights are such a big deal when there is both no competition and heavily scripted combat in group pvp, from automated syncs to delayed macros to healing animation and auto healing.
And I know you don't actually believe I've played this game and dumped more hours into this game than you have, kiddo.
tldr, will alchy duel for firewall
no, what's really counter intuitive is pat dueled me one time and quit afterwards for obvious reasons. I'm guessing he only speaks about "anybody can get lucky" once in a while when it suits him the most.
If you would have taken a class on statistics you would understand what I am saying... Lets say you have a 1:8 chance of stunning someone when you try (idk what the actually chance is) that person can stun you every single time for 1000 times in a row or none at all. It's all based on chance so in that case a person can get 1000 "lucky" stuns and you can still claim the same thing that you're claiming right now... I'm in no way claiming that this is probable, but it is possible. So therefore stating that someone won because of a "lucky" stun is not a valid argument.I am not trying to be a dick here but this really has to be one of the stupidest posts I have read on here lol. How would this post be counter-intuitive at all? If you lost to someone 1000-1 then clearly it wasn't based off luck. And you can use that argument with anything not just dueling on ultima online. Have you ever taken a class on statistics? The reason I am using stun as a variable for luck is because you can be spamming a low level spell and get a random stun with out even tabbing and chances are you're going to win if they are below 50 health. Now if you're constantly losing over and over again to the same person then clearly they have a better understanding of how to play there character.
Find anybody with half a brain and try to convince them that a 1000-1 ratio in anything is considered luck.
If you would have taken a class on statistics you would understand what I am saying... Lets say you have a 1:8 chance of stunning someone when you try (idk what the actually chance is) that person can stun you every single time for 1000 times in a row or none at all. It's all based on chance so in that case a person can get 1000 "lucky" stuns and you can still claim the same thing that you're claiming right now... I'm in no way claiming that this is probable, but it is possible. So therefore stating that someone won because of a "lucky" stun is not a valid argument.
Take it from someone who is educate.
If you would have taken a class on statistics you would understand what I am saying... Lets say you have a 1:8 chance of stunning someone when you try (idk what the actually chance is) that person can stun you every single time for 1000 times in a row or none at all. It's all based on chance so in that case a person can get 1000 "lucky" stuns and you can still claim the same thing that you're claiming right now... I'm in no way claiming that this is probable, but it is possible. So therefore stating that someone won because of a "lucky" stun is not a valid argument.