UOGamers Community

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • To obtain new Razor updates, please reinstall Razor from our new website.

What does everyone do for a living?

What do you do for work?

  • Customer Service

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • General Labor

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Administrative

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Food Industry

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Law Enforcement

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Computer / Technology

    Votes: 5 17.2%
  • Artist

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Entrepreneur

    Votes: 2 6.9%
  • Work from home

    Votes: 1 3.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 15 51.7%

  • Total voters
    29
agreed!
I was trying to get him on topic by asking what he did. I will admit i did add fuel to the fire! I tend to take up/stand up for people & yes it gets me in trouble lol. I know no one really cares but I want to apologize for it. :p

Sorry!

On another note i wonder if there is any other oilfield workers here?
Fuck you you're a offscreening son of a bitch noob you cheat and I still win yes to insta swing I Fuck your mom
 

Chaos_Lord

Sorceror
i pity the guy who must resort to useless name calling and harsh words to defend his argument. But ultimately, all you did was support my view in that all liberals are bitches and monkeys who can only back their views for a few seconds before anybody with a brain tramples them into pieces and they have to resort to forum warrior.

Which you suck at, btw. Cuz you are forever my bitch, blue.
Actually quite the reverse is true. When ignoring yearly income as a factor, being less intelligent actually increases the chances that you are conservative. The average IQ of a republican(conservative) in America is quite a bit lower (96) than the average democrat (liberal) in America (101). Once you factor in yearly earnings, it changes but only at the extremes. If you are a poor republican (under 50,000 USD a year), chances are your IQ is under 92. If you make over 250,000 a year and are a republican the average IQ is 112 (above average). I see this as a trend. If you are an ignorant christian you are poor and will continue to vote for a party that makes you poorer since you believe in the same fairy tales (religion). If you are a rich republican, you see an opportunity to join a political party that will make you richer and all you have to do is occasionally espouse some hokey religious garbage and every white trailer-park in America will beat a bible and vote for you. Relegion has been an excellent tool for the educated upper-class to control the uneducated lower classes for thousands of years (suckers!). There is no correlation between yearly income and intelligence in democrats. I couldnt find the original study but theres another linking low IQ to conservative beliefs here:
http://davesource.com/Fringe/Fringe/Politics/Conservatism-and-cognitive-ability.pdf (Stankov, 2009).
I do not know if this holds true outside of American politics. As an educated American I am ashamed of our political system. I generally vote democrat but regret it every time, it just seems slightly better than letting rich racist white men run our country (disclaimer: I am white).

Here is a fairly impartial article about intelligence and political affiliation in psychology today :
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...igence-and-politics-have-complex-relationship

(Disclaimer: I am an educated liberal and am somewhat bias)
 
Smart people have this problem that they think everyone can be as smart and nice as they are and hence they think we should lift everyone out of poverty so everyone can enjoy the same standards of living that they do. That's why they become leftists.

White trashes tend to live near Jamal and his brothers Tyrone, DeMarcus, LeSean, Denzell, etc. and they know how bad black people can be when they're in a large non-selective amount. That must be why they become conservatives.

Here's a picture:



The further away from the blacks you are (i.e. the South) the more liberal it gets.
 
Actually quite the reverse is true. When ignoring yearly income as a factor, being less intelligent actually increases the chances that you are conservative. The average IQ of a republican(conservative) in America is quite a bit lower (96) than the average democrat (liberal) in America (101). Once you factor in yearly earnings, it changes but only at the extremes. If you are a poor republican (under 50,000 USD a year), chances are your IQ is under 92. If you make over 250,000 a year and are a republican the average IQ is 112 (above average). I see this as a trend. If you are an ignorant christian you are poor and will continue to vote for a party that makes you poorer since you believe in the same fairy tales (religion). If you are a rich republican, you see an opportunity to join a political party that will make you richer and all you have to do is occasionally espouse some hokey religious garbage and every white trailer-park in America will beat a bible and vote for you. Relegion has been an excellent tool for the educated upper-class to control the uneducated lower classes for thousands of years (suckers!). There is no correlation between yearly income and intelligence in democrats. I couldnt find the original study but theres another linking low IQ to conservative beliefs here:
http://davesource.com/Fringe/Fringe/Politics/Conservatism-and-cognitive-ability.pdf (Stankov, 2009).
I do not know if this holds true outside of American politics. As an educated American I am ashamed of our political system. I generally vote democrat but regret it every time, it just seems slightly better than letting rich racist white men run our country (disclaimer: I am white).

Here is a fairly impartial article about intelligence and political affiliation in psychology today :
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...igence-and-politics-have-complex-relationship

(Disclaimer: I am an educated liberal and am somewhat bias)
There is a positive link between those who spend more time in schooling (years) and a weakening of creativity and originality.

That whole paragraph you rewrote from men before you is an entire bias based on the simple fact that there is way more involved in political leanings than simply religion or socioeconomic standings.

Again, liberalism offers no viable solutions to support 300M people (America) without some form of inequality. And once the real world and real people have shown liberals how things actually work, you'll understand. It's much more than discussing amongst your liberal or unwilling-to-debate republican friends.
 

Chaos_Lord

Sorceror
Your logic is flawed.
Are there lots of blacks in Alaska? or near Alaska? It has a population that is 3.2% African-american (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/02000.html) yet is very red. I guess it is close to huge black population in Canada, wait, it's only 2.0% (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Canada).
To further refute your broken logic:
The largest population per capita of african-americans is in Detroit. It is a liberal city, in a blue county, in a very blue state
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._cities_with_large_African-American_populations).
And more:
In sample testing, the states with the worst reading comprehension and vocabulary were :
Louisiana ,Alabama,South Carolina, Mississipi, Arizona (all red, conservative states)
The highest reading comprehension and vocabulary:
Vermont, Wyoming, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Maine (all blue, generally liberal states)
The states that vote republican (southern states) also rely more heavily on government subsidies per capita (even when filtering for whites only) and are also less-educated (on average) with lower SAT math scores and lower acceptance rates into Ivy league colleges.

You can try to church up your racist tirade but it is just that...Ignorant biggoted spew that has no place in a civilized society. Being a close-minded racist makes americans look bad as we are generally seen as trash like you to the rest of the world (due to your outspoken and embarrasing tirades Ex. the posts above and probably soon to be below).
The bright side of your biggoted ideals is that they are slowly dieing due to society growing culturally (and no longer accepting your viewpoint as valid). America will one day be primarily mixed race, women will be seen as equals, and people will realize you for the ignorant trash that you are.

In closing a map of the US that shows state IQ scores. Notice the blue covering the south(conservative) and the red primarily in the north (liberal).
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...veal-intelligence-levels-US-based-tweets.html
(disclaimer: I am from Arkansas)
Done!


Smart people have this problem that they think everyone can be as smart and nice as they are and hence they think we should lift everyone out of poverty so everyone can enjoy the same standards of living that they do. That's why they become leftists.

White trashes tend to live near Jamal and his brothers Tyrone, DeMarcus, LeSean, Denzell, etc. and they know how bad black people can be when they're in a large non-selective amount. That must be why they become conservatives.

Here's a picture:



The further away from the blacks you are (i.e. the South) the more liberal it gets.
 
Your logic is flawed.
Are there lots of blacks in Alaska? or near Alaska? It has a population that is 3.2% African-american (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/02000.html) yet is very red. I guess it is close to huge black population in Canada, wait, it's only 2.0% (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Canada).
To further refute your broken logic:
The largest population per capita of african-americans is in Detroit. It is a liberal city, in a blue county, in a very blue state
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._cities_with_large_African-American_populations).
And more:
In sample testing, the states with the worst reading comprehension and vocabulary were :
Louisiana ,Alabama,South Carolina, Mississipi, Arizona (all red, conservative states)
The highest reading comprehension and vocabulary:
Vermont, Wyoming, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Maine (all blue, generally liberal states)
The states that vote republican (southern states) also rely more heavily on government subsidies per capita (even when filtering for whites only) and are also less-educated (on average) with lower SAT math scores and lower acceptance rates into Ivy league colleges.

You can try to church up your racist tirade but it is just that...Ignorant biggoted spew that has no place in a civilized society. Being a close-minded racist makes americans look bad as we are generally seen as trash like you to the rest of the world (due to your outspoken and embarrasing tirades Ex. the posts above and probably soon to be below).
The bright side of your biggoted ideals is that they are slowly dieing due to society growing culturally (and no longer accepting your viewpoint as valid). America will one day be primarily mixed race, women will be seen as equals, and people will realize you for the ignorant trash that you are.

In closing a map of the US that shows state IQ scores. Notice the blue covering the south(conservative) and the red primarily in the north (liberal).
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...veal-intelligence-levels-US-based-tweets.html
(disclaimer: I am from Arkansas)
Done!
You do realize poorer people tend not to vote and just because somebody votes democrat, or blue as you put it, doesn't make them liberal.

In the political spectrum of things, democrats and republicans are very close to each other.

If your logic were to hold true, then the more liberal one becomes, the higher probability of a high IQ he/she holds? Are social communists through the roof of high IQ or what?

You also assume that IQ equates to anything past taking a biased test. Educated stupidity is stupidity nonetheless.
 

Chaos_Lord

Sorceror
You do realize poorer people tend not to vote and just because somebody votes democrat, or blue as you put it, doesn't make them liberal.
True, poor people vote in lower numbers, but if you vote democrat you more likely to be consider yourself a liberal when compared to conservative (this is tough to say since liberal and conservative are so subjective). I'm trying to generalize but I agree, there is some skewing, but it's close enough for the sake of argument
In the political spectrum of things, democrats and republicans are very close to each other.
It depends on your method of comparison. If you say the islamic countries are conservatives and europeans are liberals, then republicans are closer to democrats than republicans are to conservative (sharia law) countries. A democrat would be considered a HARD-CORE conservative in Europe. You are not far off but I only included the major political parties and only in the USA. Socialist's hold little to no sway in our political system and "socialist" is deragatory in the USA (not as bad as communist but not good).
If your logic were to hold true, then the more liberal one becomes, the higher probability of a high IQ he/she holds? Are social communists through the roof of high IQ or what?
This is not what I said. I said low IQ individuals tens toward conservative beliefs. This is backed by many studies and surveyed facts. High intelligence does not make you more likely to be a liberal, but low intelligence makes you more likely to be a conservative. ( Try to read the studies I posted, they have merit. Also read Shakov, 2009. I would venture and say the dumber you are the more likely you are to "parrot" whatever your parents told you. Conservative's wish to conserve the current social status and order (if you are conservative you want things to stay the same or "conserve" our culture. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism)
Also, conservatives favor belief in fairy tales over science (another sign of a lack of intelligence). They don't believe in evolution (come on!) tea partiers (ultra-conservatives) don't even belive in global warming (in which 99.8% of environmental scientists stand by), they also claim the earth is 4600 years old (lol). I know not all conservatives believe it. Many conservatives don't even belive in God, but they will say they will in order to fit in the party of the rich
You also assume that IQ equates to anything past taking a biased test. Educated stupidity is stupidity nonetheless.
I agree that IQ does not evaluate other intelligence skill such as cunning and ability to use that intelligence. But it is a goiod representation of total brain power. Do you have a better way to compare intelligence? Let's go by yearly wages (the smarter you are the more you make) and liberal states have a higher average hourly wage, higher minimum wage, higher rate of savings (by %), higher secondary education attendance (and graduation rates by %), rely less on social safety nets (welfare), and also better benefeits (on average)
 

Chaos_Lord

Sorceror
Also, you seem to hold strong conservative beliefs (your racist tirade shows you almost definitely vote republican, democrats are for blacks right?)
I just want you to understand that unless you make 250,000+ a year being republican is shooting your financial foot to save your racist(or religious) foot. Look at how Republicans want to cut EITC and the child tax credit while giving tax cuts to oil companies, military contractors, and resource-collectors . I do not benefit from either of those tax credits (disclaimer:not a penny) but a single mother making $27,000 a year does. At 27,000 a year those tax credits ad up to 2750 (more than %10 or her yearly wage). It is not fair to decrease her quality of life by %10 so Halliburton can save $48,000,000 a year (+0.00000001%)......This is the current Republican plan (happening RIGHT NOW).
If you do make 250,000+ a year.....I understand your conservative stance...If not, you are racist (or relegious) fanatic and you deserve to pay %25 tax on your hard work while the rich pay %11 on capital gains (fool).
I make less than 250,000 a year and I have to pay approximately %27 tax (my approximate effective tax rate) while Mitt Romney has an effective tax rate of 17% with earnings of millions....how is this fair? Every party fights for inequality, democarts support closer income equality which is not fair to the %1 and republicans favor the rich, which is not fair for the %99....I happen to be in the %99 but would like an opportunity to climb that ladder. I see this as easier under democratic leadership, even if %1-2 of my income goes to those less fortunate than me (im willing to give more).
 

GM Francis

Ex Hybrid Taskmaster
I've grown more conservative w/age, marriage, kids, & general increased responsibilities. Also my IQ has prob dropped steadily from decades of substance abuse :(
Oh, and my African American neighbors prob contribute too.
 
True, poor people vote in lower numbers, but if you vote democrat you more likely to be consider yourself a liberal when compared to conservative (this is tough to say since liberal and conservative are so subjective). I'm trying to generalize but I agree, there is some skewing, but it's close enough for the sake of argument

It depends on your method of comparison. If you say the islamic countries are conservatives and europeans are liberals, then republicans are closer to democrats than republicans are to conservative (sharia law) countries. A democrat would be considered a HARD-CORE conservative in Europe. You are not far off but I only included the major political parties and only in the USA. Socialist's hold little to no sway in our political system and "socialist" is deragatory in the USA (not as bad as communist but not good).

This is not what I said. I said low IQ individuals tens toward conservative beliefs. This is backed by many studies and surveyed facts. High intelligence does not make you more likely to be a liberal, but low intelligence makes you more likely to be a conservative. ( Try to read the studies I posted, they have merit. Also read Shakov, 2009. I would venture and say the dumber you are the more likely you are to "parrot" whatever your parents told you. Conservative's wish to conserve the current social status and order (if you are conservative you want things to stay the same or "conserve" our culture. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism)
Also, conservatives favor belief in fairy tales over science (another sign of a lack of intelligence). They don't believe in evolution (come on!) tea partiers (ultra-conservatives) don't even belive in global warming (in which 99.8% of environmental scientists stand by), they also claim the earth is 4600 years old (lol). I know not all conservatives believe it. Many conservatives don't even belive in God, but they will say they will in order to fit in the party of the rich

I agree that IQ does not evaluate other intelligence skill such as cunning and ability to use that intelligence. But it is a goiod representation of total brain power. Do you have a better way to compare intelligence? Let's go by yearly wages (the smarter you are the more you make) and liberal states have a higher average hourly wage, higher minimum wage, higher rate of savings (by %), higher secondary education attendance (and graduation rates by %), rely less on social safety nets (welfare), and also better benefeits (on average)

1) I'm speaking of entirely American politics. American's don't give socialists an ear because we see just how weak socialistic/communistic nations are, and how terribly unsettling their societal structure is.

2)If you say low IQ individuals generally vote conservative, then the reverse must be true for high IQ individuals whom vote liberal. The ladder easily being debunked, so the former can not be true.

3) IQ scores do not test 'brain power'. Not even entirely sure that is a thing, but ultimately I'd value critical thinking skills and creative ideas over book smarts and learned stupidity/redundancy.

Ultimately, socialism holds very little value to me or this country. Tax breaks to big business and wealthy individuals, or government subsidies to major corporations who will eventually jump overseas is unsettling to me. Citizen's united is a step in the wrong direction, and I don't believe lobbyists should be able to hound congressmen.
 

Chaos_Lord

Sorceror
1) I'm speaking of entirely American politics. American's don't give socialists an ear because we see just how weak socialistic/communistic nations are, and how terribly unsettling their societal structure is.
You are incorrect. Norway is a socialist country with the highest average quality of life on the planet(http://news.discovery.com/human/nations-quality-of-life-rankings.htm). They also have the lowest income inequality on the planet. the Norwegian government owns all major infrastucture (roads, oil reserves, gas, etc) and utilities. They match the definition of a pure socialist government TO THE T! They're quality of life is much higher than Americans. They pay Mcdonalds employees a LIVING wage, the economy prospers since most of the population has additional income to keep the economy going, and they also save more on average then Americans so they are better prepared for economic collapse.
Please quote some sources. Quoting yourself as you Spew garbage from your trailer-park is not considered acceptable debate tactics.
2)If you say low IQ individuals generally vote conservative, then the reverse must be true for high IQ individuals whom vote liberal. The ladder easily being debunked, so the former can not be true.
"latter" (https://www.google.com/search?q=lad...n-US:official&channel=sb&q=ladder+definitions)
No it must not be true. It gets too complicated to make blanket statements above 100 since the dots (meaning there is little correlation) are all over the graph. I guess I could try to break it down by IQ partitions (Ex IQ 100-105, 105-110,vote this way etc etc) but that is too much work for me to prove a point that will be lost in the din of your trailer-park. Noone has done the work for me in a paper I can find(I'm lazy). I also lack the language skills to break it down for you. I will pointlessly try anyway....
In essences: If you are of low intelligence (IQ below 100) you are more likely to vote conservative (my guess is you don't even try to read the sources I post, otherwise I would find and post one here but not wasting my time as you obviously did not read or possibly could not comprehend the previous sources). As intelligence increases above 100, there is no correlation between voting either way (unless you make over $200,000 a year than if you have an IQ above 100 you will most likely vote republican). If one statement is true at one end it DOES NOT mean it is reflected on the other end. Data graphs are NOT always symmetric about an axis, especially when you are charting people. Meaning at 100-105 IQ they may vote (THESE NUMBERS ARE COMPLETELY MADE UP FOR THE SAKE OF EXPLANATION) 51/49 liberal conservative, 110-115 59/43, 115-120 43/59....Since every statistic has a margin of error they are considered inconclusive statistics (meaning you cant make blanket statements about them like I did about IQ's below 100 and voting conservative). Once you get above IQ 100; geographic, socioeconomic, culture, and age begin affecting political affiliations more so than religious affiliation does at lower IQ's. I will venture the hypothesis that the smarter you are, the more likely you are to think for yourself and consider multiple topics when considering political affiliation. When you are dumb you'll pick an easy one that requires zero thought and mostly parrot what people around you say (Ex. trailer-park racists, religious zealots, blue-collar workers voting for whoever they're boss tells them etc)
3) IQ scores do not test 'brain power'. Not even entirely sure that is a thing, but ultimately I'd value critical thinking skills and creative ideas over book smarts and learned stupidity/redundancy.
Agreed, it's a good thing that the major purpose of a college education is to promote parallel thinking, problem-solving skills, and critical thinking. The facts you learn in college are barely retained, the entire purpose is to promote a well-rounded ability to solve a variety of problems. That is why Physics majors have to take history, language, and other seemingly unrelated classes. It is to promote a well-rounded individual that can solve a variety of problems. We all have google to answer the definition of a zwitterion, but only someone who actually studied it could recall the way that zwitterion would behave in a variety of environments and use that to solve a particular problem. Knowledge is easily attained (and forgotten) while the ability to use logic to solve a problem through reason lasts for life. To say an educated person lacks something (like common sense, life-skills, etc)due to having an education doesn't make any sense. (Please quote sources, I doubt you will find them since your are standing on a very weak argument).
Ultimately, socialism holds very little value to me or this country. Tax breaks to big business and wealthy individuals, or government subsidies to major corporations who will eventually jump overseas is unsettling to me. Citizen's united is a step in the wrong direction, and I don't believe lobbyists should be able to hound congressmen.
I disagree, I am a secret socialist. If I wasn't protected by the anonymity of the internet i would not say so but I support socialism entirely. I know some countries do not implement in a fair way (Ex. France and the %75 tax on earning over 1 million [whatever the french currency is, franc maybe..]) But there are plenty of countries that are socialist and do an excellent job of balancing fair social safety nets Vs encouraging individual success (Norway). You say you are uncomfortable with giving corporations tax breaks, but i say you are less comfortable voting for a black guy than you are for giving corporations tax breaks....That's why you vote republican (They do NOTHING but give tax breaks to the rich since they are job creators, it doesn't even matter if you are a minimum wage job creator=TAX BREAK!). You could never bring yourself to vote for a black man since your fear of someone different than you will always override your fear of being poor forever.
 

White Lotus

Sorceror
To get this thread back on topic.

I whore myself out on webcam with shini and amtothepm while i play uo for a living. We take turns entertaining the viewers by putting on winter robes and taking off barstools.
 

Shini

Page
To get this thread back on topic.

I whore myself out on webcam with shini and amtothepm while i play uo for a living. We take turns entertaining the viewers by putting on winter robes and taking off barstools.

Hush please this truth is making me feel uncomfortable.
 
You are incorrect. Norway is a socialist country with the highest average quality of life on the planet(http://news.discovery.com/human/nations-quality-of-life-rankings.htm). They also have the lowest income inequality on the planet. the Norwegian government owns all major infrastucture (roads, oil reserves, gas, etc) and utilities. They match the definition of a pure socialist government TO THE T! They're quality of life is much higher than Americans. They pay Mcdonalds employees a LIVING wage, the economy prospers since most of the population has additional income to keep the economy going, and they also save more on average then Americans so they are better prepared for economic collapse.
Please quote some sources. Quoting yourself as you Spew garbage from your trailer-park is not considered acceptable debate tactics.

"latter" (https://www.google.com/search?q=ladder&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:eek:fficial&client=firefox-a&channel=sb#rls=org.mozilla:en-US:eek:fficial&channel=sb&q=ladder definitions)
No it must not be true. It gets too complicated to make blanket statements above 100 since the dots (meaning there is little correlation) are all over the graph. I guess I could try to break it down by IQ partitions (Ex IQ 100-105, 105-110,vote this way etc etc) but that is too much work for me to prove a point that will be lost in the din of your trailer-park. Noone has done the work for me in a paper I can find(I'm lazy). I also lack the language skills to break it down for you. I will pointlessly try anyway....
In essences: If you are of low intelligence (IQ below 100) you are more likely to vote conservative (my guess is you don't even try to read the sources I post, otherwise I would find and post one here but not wasting my time as you obviously did not read or possibly could not comprehend the previous sources). As intelligence increases above 100, there is no correlation between voting either way (unless you make over $200,000 a year than if you have an IQ above 100 you will most likely vote republican). If one statement is true at one end it DOES NOT mean it is reflected on the other end. Data graphs are NOT always symmetric about an axis, especially when you are charting people. Meaning at 100-105 IQ they may vote (THESE NUMBERS ARE COMPLETELY MADE UP FOR THE SAKE OF EXPLANATION) 51/49 liberal conservative, 110-115 59/43, 115-120 43/59....Since every statistic has a margin of error they are considered inconclusive statistics (meaning you cant make blanket statements about them like I did about IQ's below 100 and voting conservative). Once you get above IQ 100; geographic, socioeconomic, culture, and age begin affecting political affiliations more so than religious affiliation does at lower IQ's. I will venture the hypothesis that the smarter you are, the more likely you are to think for yourself and consider multiple topics when considering political affiliation. When you are dumb you'll pick an easy one that requires zero thought and mostly parrot what people around you say (Ex. trailer-park racists, religious zealots, blue-collar workers voting for whoever they're boss tells them etc)

Agreed, it's a good thing that the major purpose of a college education is to promote parallel thinking, problem-solving skills, and critical thinking. The facts you learn in college are barely retained, the entire purpose is to promote a well-rounded ability to solve a variety of problems. That is why Physics majors have to take history, language, and other seemingly unrelated classes. It is to promote a well-rounded individual that can solve a variety of problems. We all have google to answer the definition of a zwitterion, but only someone who actually studied it could recall the way that zwitterion would behave in a variety of environments and use that to solve a particular problem. Knowledge is easily attained (and forgotten) while the ability to use logic to solve a problem through reason lasts for life. To say an educated person lacks something (like common sense, life-skills, etc)due to having an education doesn't make any sense. (Please quote sources, I doubt you will find them since your are standing on a very weak argument).

I disagree, I am a secret socialist. If I wasn't protected by the anonymity of the internet i would not say so but I support socialism entirely. I know some countries do not implement in a fair way (Ex. France and the %75 tax on earning over 1 million [whatever the french currency is, franc maybe..]) But there are plenty of countries that are socialist and do an excellent job of balancing fair social safety nets Vs encouraging individual success (Norway). You say you are uncomfortable with giving corporations tax breaks, but i say you are less comfortable voting for a black guy than you are for giving corporations tax breaks....That's why you vote republican (They do NOTHING but give tax breaks to the rich since they are job creators, it doesn't even matter if you are a minimum wage job creator=TAX BREAK!). You could never bring yourself to vote for a black man since your fear of someone different than you will always override your fear of being poor forever.

Norway has about 5 million people and is nowhere near the world power America is. To say that America can become a socialistic world power is really a terrible thought. I'm tired of disrupting your irrational IQ linked with political leans spark, because you simply don't understand that so much goes into a single person's belief system rather than a score or 'brain power' one has.

Oh, and I think it's really funny you think you are anonymous on the internet when I can grab your IP address, locate your ISP, find your real address, search public domain and find out your real life name. Also, much like you have done in this thread, I would be assuming you own a facebook and can match it with your location geographically and begin to read everything about you, because I doubt it's set to private/friends-only. And if you believe I can't do this, understand that NSA/CIA have an even easier way of tracking anything you do on your internet.

And I'm still wondering why you've assumed me to be racist. I love black people. Everybody should own a few.
 
Top